<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Writing on Harlan D. Harris</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/tags/writing/</link><description>Recent content in Writing on Harlan D. Harris</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</managingEditor><webMaster>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://harlanh.tech/tags/writing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Defensible Use of AI in Writing (Like This)</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/2026/01/defensible-use-of-ai-in-writing-like-this/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author><guid>https://harlanh.tech/2026/01/defensible-use-of-ai-in-writing-like-this/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;If AI helps me get ideas from my head to the readers' heads faster, that's good.
Society thrives when ideas are shared, critiqued, and built on.
But authors shouldn't take credit for other peoples' ideas -- they should
synthesize others' ideas, including the &amp;quot;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web"&gt;blurry JPG of the web&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;
that is LLMs. The question is: what makes AI-assisted writing defensible? When is
it helpful to society, and when is it plagiarism? When can you
still be considered the author of AI-assisted writing?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>