<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Smartphones on Harlan D. Harris</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/tags/smartphones/</link><description>Recent content in Smartphones on Harlan D. Harris</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</managingEditor><webMaster>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://harlanh.tech/tags/smartphones/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Apple TV and cross-device user-interface integration</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/2011/11/apple-tv-and-cross-device-user-interface-integration/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author><guid>https://harlanh.tech/2011/11/apple-tv-and-cross-device-user-interface-integration/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;On &lt;a href="http://5by5.tv/buildanalyze/49" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;last week’s Build and Analyze&lt;/a&gt; – a great podcast nominally about iOS development, but actually more about just living a tech-geek lifestyle – Marco talked a lot about the rumored “Apple TV” and whether it could actually be a groundbreaking product. He concluded that it probably couldn’t. Most people wouldn’t dump a working TV just for an Apple brand; the touch-screen interface that Apple has been using for the iPad and iPhone wouldn’t work for a TV; the only apps that would work well on a TV would be just ways of getting better content (I note that Roku apps are laughable, with the exception of Angry Birds); getting access to better content than other competitors is probably impossible, even for Apple.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For these reasons and more, Marco suggested that there’s little that Apple, or anyone else, could do to substantially improve the TV experience, with the exception of better menu design.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think there’s a way that Apple (or someone) could integrate modern technology into a TV that would be actually compelling, though. And in some ways it’s the same way that I&lt;a title="Smartphones, MP3 players, and Bluetooth: the division of labor" href="https://harlanh.tech/2010/03/smartphones-mp3-players-and-bluetooth-the-division-of-labor/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt; earlier blogged about for MP3 players&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Cross-device user-interfaces&lt;/em&gt;. Here’s how it might work for a television:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Smartphones, MP3 players, and Bluetooth: the division of labor</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/2010/03/smartphones-mp3-players-and-bluetooth-the-division-of-labor/</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author><guid>https://harlanh.tech/2010/03/smartphones-mp3-players-and-bluetooth-the-division-of-labor/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;As more and more people get smartphones that can play MP3s or streamed music, like the iPhone or Android phone like the upcoming &lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/htc-evo-4g-is-sprints-android-powered-knight-in-superphone-armo/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;HTC Evo 4G &lt;/a&gt;(I’m gettin’ one!), fewer and fewer people are buying standalone MP3 players. Why have two gadgets when you can have just one? But I think there are good reasons to do so, but I don’t think the right combination of products are currently on the market. Here’s my thinking.</description></item></channel></rss>