<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Simplicity on Harlan D. Harris</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/tags/simplicity/</link><description>Recent content in Simplicity on Harlan D. Harris</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</managingEditor><webMaster>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://harlanh.tech/tags/simplicity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Are LLMs a simple solution? And if so, for what problems?</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/2023/09/are-llms-a-simple-solution/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author><guid>https://harlanh.tech/2023/09/are-llms-a-simple-solution/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;The other day, I was reading a
&lt;a href="https://studio.ribbonfarm.com/p/my-climate-posture"&gt;post by Venkatash Rao&lt;/a&gt;
(thousands of words of under-edited brilliance, as usual), and was struck by
this note about the complexity of climate solutions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tend to take as an article of faith the systems science rule of thumb that
the complexity of solutions generally matches the complexity of the problems.
If it doesn’t, then you either got lucky, or there are negative externalities
you’re ignoring.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>