<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mp3 on Harlan D. Harris</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/tags/mp3/</link><description>Recent content in Mp3 on Harlan D. Harris</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</managingEditor><webMaster>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://harlanh.tech/tags/mp3/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Smartphones, MP3 players, and Bluetooth: the division of labor</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/2010/03/smartphones-mp3-players-and-bluetooth-the-division-of-labor/</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author><guid>https://harlanh.tech/2010/03/smartphones-mp3-players-and-bluetooth-the-division-of-labor/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;As more and more people get smartphones that can play MP3s or streamed music, like the iPhone or Android phone like the upcoming &lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/htc-evo-4g-is-sprints-android-powered-knight-in-superphone-armo/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;HTC Evo 4G &lt;/a&gt;(I’m gettin’ one!), fewer and fewer people are buying standalone MP3 players. Why have two gadgets when you can have just one? But I think there are good reasons to do so, but I don’t think the right combination of products are currently on the market. Here’s my thinking.</description></item></channel></rss>