<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Internet on Harlan D. Harris</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/tags/internet/</link><description>Recent content in Internet on Harlan D. Harris</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</managingEditor><webMaster>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://harlanh.tech/tags/internet/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>On .name and third-level domains</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/2013/05/on-name-and-third-level-domains/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author><guid>https://harlanh.tech/2013/05/on-name-and-third-level-domains/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;And, we’re back! After being off-line for several weeks, this site is now live again! I can’t imagine you missed it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s what happened. Let’s start at the beginning. In 2003, ICANN added &lt;code&gt;.name&lt;/code&gt; to the list of top-level domains (like &lt;code&gt;.com&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;.edu&lt;/code&gt;, etc.). The idea is that individuals would use it for personal sites and email addresses. You can still do this, but (in case you haven’t noticed), it’s not very popular, and most domain name registrars don’t even sell &lt;code&gt;.name&lt;/code&gt; addresses.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Online publishing, micropayments, and warm fuzzy feelings</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/2009/10/online-publishing-micropayments-and-warm-fuzzy-feelings/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author><guid>https://harlanh.tech/2009/10/online-publishing-micropayments-and-warm-fuzzy-feelings/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;The problem of how to monetize online publishing, particularly news publishing, is neither new nor all that surprising. But the ongoing lack of a solution is steadily eating into news organizations across the country. Yesterday, &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/business/media/20times.html?ref=business"&gt;the Times announced it was going to buy out or lay off 8% of its newsroom staff&lt;/a&gt;, despite being the best national newspaper in the country and probably the one making the best use of Internet technologies. (&lt;a href="http://infosthetics.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?search=nytimes&amp;amp;IncludeBlogs=1&amp;amp;limit=20"&gt;Their interactive graphics are some of the best around.&lt;/a&gt;) How can newspapers make money on the web? Ad revenue is inadequate, and people won’t generally pay for content. &lt;a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/micropayments-for-news-the-holy-grail-or-just-a-dangerous-delusion/"&gt;This post&lt;/a&gt; from a journalism blog at Harvard discusses why micropayments will never work:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>