<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Graphics on Harlan D. Harris</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/tags/graphics/</link><description>Recent content in Graphics on Harlan D. Harris</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</managingEditor><webMaster>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://harlanh.tech/tags/graphics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>hacking .gov shortened links</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/2011/07/hacking-gov-shortened-links/</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author><guid>https://harlanh.tech/2011/07/hacking-gov-shortened-links/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;This past Friday, the web portal to the US Federal government, USA.gov, &lt;a href="http://blog.usa.gov/post/7054661537/1-usa-gov-open-data-and-hack-day"&gt;organized hackathons&lt;/a&gt; across the US for programmers and data scientists to work with and analyze the data from their link-shortening service. It turns out that if you shorten a web link with &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt;, the shortened link looks like &lt;a href="http://1.usa.gov/V6NpL"&gt;1.usa.gov/V6NpL&lt;/a&gt; (that one goes to a NASA page). And because this service was paid for by taxpayer money, the data about each clickthrough is freely available.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>intuitive visualizations of categorization for non-technical audiences</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/2011/04/intuitive-visualizations-of-categorization-for-non-technical-audiences/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author><guid>https://harlanh.tech/2011/04/intuitive-visualizations-of-categorization-for-non-technical-audiences/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;For a project I’m working on at work, I’m building a predictive model that categorizes something (I can’t tell you what) into two bins. There is a default bin that 95% of the things belong to and a bin that the business cares a lot about, containing 5% of the things. Some readers may be familiar with the use of predictive models to identify better sales leads, so that you can target the leads most likely to convert and minimize the amount of effort wasted on people who won’t purchase your product. Although my situation doesn’t have to do with sales leads, I’m going to pretend it does, as it’s a common domain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My data is many thousands of “leads”, for which I’ve constructed hundreds of predictive features (mostly 1/0, a few numeric) each. I can plug this data into any number of common statistical and machine learning systems which will crunch the numbers and provide a black box that can do a pretty good job of separating more-valuable leads from less valuable leads. That’s great, but now I have to communicate what I’ve done, and how valuable it is, to an audience that struggles with relatively simple statistical concepts like correlation. What can I do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ggplot and concepts -- what's right, and what's wrong</title><link>https://harlanh.tech/2010/03/ggplot-and-concepts-whats-right-and-whats-wrong/</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>harlan@harris.name (Harlan Harris)</author><guid>https://harlanh.tech/2010/03/ggplot-and-concepts-whats-right-and-whats-wrong/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;A few months back I gave a presentation to the &lt;a href="http://www.meetup.com/nyhackr/"&gt;NYC R Meetup&lt;/a&gt;. (&lt;a href="http://www.r-project.org/"&gt;R&lt;/a&gt; is a statistical programming language. If this means nothing to you, feel free to stop reading now.) The presentation was on &lt;a href="http://had.co.nz/ggplot2/"&gt;ggplot2&lt;/a&gt;, a popular package for generating graphs of data and statistics. In the talk (&lt;a href="http://www.vcasmo.com/video/drewconway/7017"&gt;which you can see here&lt;/a&gt;, including both my slides and my patter!) I presented both the really great things about ggplot2 and some of its downsides. In this blog post, I wanted to expand a bit on my thinking on ggplot, the Grammar of Graphics, and how peoples’ conceptual representations of graphs, data, ggplot, and R all interact. ggplot is both incredibly elegant and unfortunately difficult to learn to use well, I think as a consequence of the variety of representations.</description></item></channel></rss>